Clusters and Socionic Profiles of Oxytocin

№ 0

AVERAGE OF THE 13 OXYTOCIN CLUSTERS

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,15

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

The final socionic profile of oxytocin (which we show in this post) was obtained by averaging 13 properties that are markers of oxytocin action, namely:

Cluster OXT-01. Likes touching, hugging, tactile contact, readily allows intrusions into personal space, and willingly intrudes into others’ personal space for the purpose of drawing closer and merging personal spaces

Cluster OXT-02. Likes slow touches and stroking the hairs on their skin

Cluster OXT-03. Trustfulness toward other people

Cluster OXT-04. Suggestibility

Cluster OXT-05. Openness about one’s experiences and feelings

Cluster OXT-06. Rapidly growing feeling of attachment

Cluster OXT-07. Friendliness, caring, responsiveness

Cluster OXT-08. Erogenous zone of the nipples

Cluster OXT-09. Love of children

Cluster OXT-10. Need to feel unity with people

Cluster OXT-11. Often consults others

Cluster OXT-12. Gaze into the eyes or eye area of another person

Cluster OXT-13. Enhanced social memory. Observant memory for people’s faces and voices

----------—

These 13 clusters themselves were identified by us on the basis of an analysis of literature data on the study of behavioral manifestations associated with increases or decreases in oxytocin in the human body (experiments involving the study both of native oxytocin concentrations in the body and of artificially increased concentrations).

The corresponding DOC file containing a detailed literature review on this topic is attached to this post.

We will begin from the end – that is, before going through all these 13 oxytocin clusters, we will first immediately show the final result (something that had never previously been done on our group’s wall)– the socionic profile of elevated oxytocin, obtained by averaging the profiles of all these clusters (see the attached image with the profiles)

We will consider the individual clusters in subsequent posts.

It can be seen from the image that OXYTOCIN leads to increases in ethics, judiciousness, sensing, and declatimity. Fe, Si, and De increase first and foremost, whereas the Ni and Ti functions – decrease substantially.

The corresponding effects of increased oxytocin concentration are, in general, universal in both men and women.

----------—

By the way, did you know that oxytocin has a multiphasic action – a one-time increase in its concentration in a number of cases triggers the mechanism of its natural release (in the appropriate situations programmed by nature) subsequently as well?

In particular, during normal vaginal childbirth there is a sharp release of oxytocin into the blood and into the cerebrospinal fluid (that is, into the CNS). And only because of this, oxytocin is also released subsequently, after contact between the mother’s skin and the child’s skin after birth (when the child is held against the breast). In the absence of oxytocin release during childbirth, as, for example, after a planned cesarean section, oxytocin will not be released subsequently either, both during skin-to-skin contact and during breastfeeding in the postpartum period ( Velandia et al., 2012 ). And this leads to such mothers not developing a full-fledged attachment to the child. However, this effect is fully restored in mothers who gave birth by cesarean section if, immediately after delivery by cesarean section, they received infusions of exogenous oxytocin (by spraying an oxytocin solution into the nose or by another method).

Who knows – do Russian clinics give women in labor, immediately after a cesarean section, the oxytocin that is absolutely necessary for them in such cases?

OXYTOCIN – PROCEEDING THROUGH ITS INDIVIDUAL CLUSTERS

Cluster OXT-01. Likes touching, hugging, tactile contact, readily allows intrusions into personal space, and willingly intrudes into others’ personal space for the purpose of drawing closer and merging personal spaces

№ 0

Likes touching, hugging, tactile contact; readily allows intrusions into personal space and willingly intrudes into others’ personal space for the purpose of drawing closer and merging personal spaces

Averaging of profiles for 20 scale questions, 35785 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,21

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I usually enjoy handshakes, touching, and hugs. 0,921
2. I like all kinds of hugs, tenderness, and stroking. 0,920
3. I like to affectionately touch my children or relatives in passing when they simply walk by: give them a hug, kiss them, stroke them. 0,910
4. I like hugging people close to me (not only sexual partners). 0,905
5. Close contact with a person close to me (touches, hugs) always gives me great pleasure. 0,880
6. I like close bodily contact with friends - hugging, holding hands, putting an arm around them, patting them on the shoulder, linking arms, etc. 0,867
7. I like sitting next to people close to me while embracing. 0,801
8. I like the procedure of shaking hands with friends. 0,793
9. When talking with a friend, I have a habit of giving him a heavy pat on the shoulder or taking him firmly by the arm (while walking outside). 0,784
10. I like “hugs” with people close to me, or at least touching or holding hands. 0,742
11. During a conversation, I can often take the other person by the shoulder, elbow, or hand. 0,699
12. I like running my fingers through the hair on the head of a loved one. 0,556 ---------------—
13. It is true that I rarely allow anyone to touch me or my clothing with their hands, whoever I may be speaking or interacting with, even among friends and even in a crowd. -0,861
14. It is true that I do not like being touched during a conversation - even by friends. -0,852
15. When I am in a bad mood, I categorically dislike it when people try to hug me or even simply touch me. -0,823
16. I make sure that people do not come too close to me during a conversation. -0,800
17. Accidental touches of strangers’ hands on my skin are very unpleasant to me. -0,770
18. I prefer to sleep alone in a bed. -0,750
19. If people close to me, with good intentions but without asking, touch my skin or hair: 1) I will more often respond to my partner in approximately the same way, also with gentle touches. 5) I am more likely to jump away, push them away, brush their hand aside, or simply look irritated and say something. -0,745
20. Touching a person’s body or the clothing they are wearing is appropriate for me only during sex, or when taking a child into one’s arms, but never - in everyday life. -0,742

Cluster OXT-02. Likes slow touches and stroking the hairs on their skin

№ 0

Likes slow light touches and stroking the hairs on their skin

Averaging of profiles for 10 scale questions, 13356 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,20

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I experience a very pleasant sensation when a person close to me slowly and lightly runs their fingers over the hairs on my skin. 0,955
2. I like it when someone affectionately runs their fingers through my hair. 0,940
3. I like gentle caresses of my forearms with light, slow touches of another person’s hand. 0,900
4. As a rule, I immediately experience a pleasant sensation from simply having the back of my head or neck stroked. 0,867
5. I like tousling or running my fingers through the hair on the head of a person close to me. 0,809
6. With children, I like affectionately running my hand through their hair. 0,780
7. I like light, unhurried touches and stroking. 0,753 -------------—
8. I do not like it and become irritated when, during the day (rather than at night in bed), even a person close to me places a hand on my head or touches my hair in an attempt to show affection. -0,920
9. I cannot stand it when people touch my face, head, or neck - even people close to me. -0,771
10. I do not like it when someone touches the skin on my back or the back of my neck with their fingers. -0,651

Cluster OXT-03. Trustfulness toward other people

№ 0

Trustfulness toward other people

Averaging of profiles for 44 scale questions, 57772 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,34

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I trust others. 0,957
2. I treat most people around me with warmth and goodwill, practically never wondering whether they are “concealing a stone behind their back.” 0,947
3. I trust others. 0,941
4. I usually trust what people say. 0,934
5. I usually trust what people say. 0,934
6. I believe that other people have good intentions in most cases. 0,927
7. My attitude toward the people around me has practically always been trusting. 0,925
8. I trust other people. 0,922
9. I believe that other people have good intentions in most cases. 0,919
10. Which characterizes you more? 1) Distrustfulness. 5) Trustfulness. 0,914
11. I am very trusting in communication. 0,892
12. I am usually inclined to trust another person’s word of honor and oaths, even if I am dealing with someone I barely know. 0,887
13. It often seems to me that all people are my friends. 0,872
14. I have many bright hopes. 0,854
15. I usually trust what people say. 0,843
16. As a rule, I have been very trusting of people. 0,840
17. My feelings are always very open to others and sincere. 0,786 ----------------—
18. It is true that I do not trust people. -0,971
19. It is true that I never trust people. -0,957
20. I am suspicious rather than trusting. -0,955
21. It is true that I do not trust people. -0,938
22. I am always mentally prepared and internally ready for possible betrayal by friends. -0,912
23. If people behave in a friendly way, that is suspicious; they may try to use or exploit me. -0,901
24. People with whom we are close may prove treacherous or betray me. Loyalty and reliability among close people — a great rarity in this world. -0,896
25. On the whole, I am a “prickly” and wary person. -0,895
26. There is much more ironic distrustfulness in me than readiness for friendship and brotherly love. -0,892
27. My remarks in conversation often carry an implied dissatisfaction with, or doubt about, the person I am speaking to. -0,885
28. Only fools trust other people. -0,883
29. Deep down, other people are not friendly. -0,879
30. It is unsafe to trust people. -0,877
31. I simply cannot trust the people around me - nothing good should be expected from them. -0,865
32. I believe that people are evil by nature. -0,860
33. I show distrust toward strangers. -0,850
34. I am wary of others. -0,849
35. I should not trust anyone. -0,835
36. It is true that I do not take anyone at their word. -0,825
37. Since my youth, I have tended to have a suspicious-distrustful attitude toward people. -0,816
38. No one can be trusted; one must rely only on oneself. -0,813
39. I do not have complete trust in anyone. -0,804
40. Other people will inevitably try to use or manipulate me if I am not careful. -0,769
41. I am usually wary of people - I expect that they will be more likely to interfere with my actions and activity. -0,767
42. With people whom I have only recently met, I always maintain a “long” interpersonal distance and do not allow any particular degree of trust. -0,738
43. If other people learn something about me, they will use it against me. -0,705
44. Before allowing a person to work, one should test their quality and durability under specially created experimental conditions (without informing them of this). -0,704

Cluster OXT-04. Suggestibility

№ 0

Suggestibility

Averaging of profiles for 14 scale questions, 13517 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,20

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I think I am a highly suggestible person. 0,882
2. I am easily influenced by other people’s emotions and moral considerations. 0,866
3. I lose my peace of mind if I feel that the people around me are oppressed by something. 0,838
4. I often act quite differently from what I initially wanted because I readily give in to other people’s requests. 0,832
5. Gypsy women could probably “hypnotize” me if they wished. 0,798
6. I am strongly influenced by other people’s needs. 0,795
7. I easily catch other people’s moods. 0,778
8. I am usually trusting of the information I am given. 0,660 ----------------—
9. My frequent position is: “no, no, and no again.” -0,892
10. I always treat the information I am given with very great doubt. -0,837
11. It is difficult to suggest anything to me, and I think it is altogether impossible to hypnotize me. -0,811
12. When something is proposed to me that is interesting from their, someone else’s, point of view, it is most often just another piece of nonsense, and if they start persuading and imposing it on me, I will not take an interest in it simply on principle. -0,807
13. I believe that television advertising has practically no effect on me. -0,795
14. To almost any question or proposal, I more often answer “no” at first. -0,791

Cluster OXT-05. Openness about one’s experiences and feelings

№ 0

Openness about one’s experiences and feelings

Averaging of profiles for 19 scale questions, 21697 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,31

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I readily show my feelings. 0,940
2. I readily share my problems and suffering with the people around me, seeking understanding, sympathy, and support. 0,936
3. In the company of friends, I like talking about my personal experiences in my youth and in the past. 0,932
4. I readily tell acquaintances about my troubles and misfortunes. 0,896
5. I speak openly about my feelings. 0,888
6. I am not embarrassed to tell friends about my affairs of the heart and declarations of love. 0,854
7. I like long gatherings in the company of people loyal to me, whom I see as grateful listeners, beside whom I can indulge in recollections and abstract reflections about the experiences of my life and about the past. 0,833
8. I readily show my feelings. 0,828
9. Quite often something inside prods me to “unburden my soul” and confess to someone. 0,820
10. I behave frankly and openly toward others. 0,689
11. Quite often I discuss my own or other people’s state of health, pleasant or unpleasant sensations, and take an interest in what hurts where - in general, these are normal topics of conversation for me. 0,640 ----------------—
12. I am secretive about my feelings. -0,938
13. I do not let anyone into my inner world. -0,929
14. It is true that I never discuss aloud with friends what I am going to do. -0,906
15. Secretiveness is a characteristic trait of mine. -0,864
16. I always conceal the motives for my actions from other people. -0,843
17. I do not share with others - even with people close to me, but I sometimes give gifts instead (to whomever I want, and whenever I want). -0,729
18. I never talk with friends about the objects of my love and sympathy, but as a rule I readily discuss in company the merits of politicians, performers, and other well-known people - which of them deserves respect and for what, and which does not -0,729
19. It will always be difficult for other people to find out what is “in my head.” -0,637

Cluster OXT-06. Rapidly growing feeling of attachment

№ 0

Rapidly growing feeling of attachment

Averaging of profiles for 9 scale questions, 14704 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,29

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I easily find common ground with other people and quickly begin to feel a spiritual bond with them. 0,922
2. I readily “pick up” other people’s positive emotions. 0,874
3. My sexuality is always colored by a feeling of being in love, active benevolent sympathy, and rapidly growing attachment to the object of desire. 0,864
4. I become attached to my female partners (male partners) easily and quickly 0,846
5. I usually sought to become as close as possible to a new friend and establish the closest possible emotional contact with them. 0,840
6. I have more than three personal friends, and I am always loyal to them in any difficult moment. 0,825 -------------—
7. It is better to be alone. -0,933
8. Close relationships with people are not important to me. One close person - the maximum acceptable to me. -0,921
9. It is better to be alone than to feel «attached» to other people. I do not know how to derive pleasure from communication and closeness. -0,884

Cluster OXT-07. Friendliness, caring, responsiveness

№ 0

Friendliness, caring, responsiveness

Averaging of profiles for 41 scale questions, 65657 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,34

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I like giving gifts and can be happy for my friends; I am a very hospitable host, I like guests, and I know how to create a good atmosphere at home. 0,940
2. I derive pleasure from caring for other people. 0,932
3. I try to do pleasant things for others constantly, rather than from time to time. 0,926
4. When guests come, the main thing I pay attention to is making sure that no one, even in the farthest corner, is bored. 0,920
5. I often feel empathy and concern for the people who are nearby. 0,918
6. In my warm hospitality, I can even become intrusive. 0,891
7. I readily make time for others. 0,882
8. I am more responsive than other people I know. 0,878
9. I am generous when it comes to feasts and like organizing recreation and entertainment for friends. 0,877
10. Anticipation of someone else’s “thank you,” of sincere gratitude, almost always motivates me to act. 0,875
11. I like helping people and always derive pleasure from it. 0,867
12. I like doing pleasant things for people. 0,863
13. I have a kind word for everyone. 0,854
14. I know how to give compliments and like doing so; I strive to do pleasant things for people. 0,844
15. I readily make time for others. 0,841
16. I know how to show, and often do show, care that is sensitive to other people’s comfort. 0,840
17. I constantly try to enliven and please people, to say something pleasant to them and hear something pleasant from them. 0,835
18. I readily feel sympathy for people; I often perceive even the problems of a stranger almost as if they were my own. 0,833
19. I often feel concern and care toward people who are less fortunate than I am. 0,818
20. I am always friendly and pleasant in communication and spend a great deal of time on comforts for myself and my friends. 0,817
21. My coworkers readily turn to me for help. 0,800
22. I like guests and very much like treating them to food. 0,799
23. I am always ready to help. 0,791
24. I usually enter into contact with new strangers by demonstrating my sympathy and goodwill, being the first to establish contact with friendly words. 0,790
25. I sometimes “pester” others with my caretaking. 0,787
26. I like praising people and easily find something encouraging and optimistic in everything. 0,780
27. I derive pleasure from rousing people and lifting their mood. 0,777
28. I like lifting people’s mood and dispelling their boredom. 0,678
29. Toward weaker members of the family I am very caring and altruistic, especially in everyday details; sometimes my caring even turns into hypertrophied caretaking. 0,671
30. I like creating coziness for myself and my friends. 0,671
31. A cash bonus is better spent immediately on gifts for the family than saved “for a rainy day.” 0,645
32. Above all, I like expressing my goodwill toward a person by helping satisfy their everyday needs - feeding them, taking care of their peaceful sleep and comfortable rest. 0,609
33. I like taking care of animals. 0,592
34. I always keep a small supply of food for others - in case someone I know suddenly becomes hungry. 0,545 --------------—
35. Compared with other people, coldness rather than warmth is more characteristic of me in communication. -0,872
36. I do not need friends; I am accustomed to getting by without them. -0,860
37. I do not like empathizing with others - let them worry about themselves. -0,837
38. I am cold and hard rather than gentle and responsive. -0,789
39. If I need nothing from a person, then showing obvious sympathy toward them - that is tactless, improper, and in bad taste. -0,787
40. When I praise someone, I sometimes seem unconvincing even to myself. -0,764
41. I am not very observant of other people’s illness and poor health, rarely notice them, and therefore more often learn that a person close to me is ill only when they tell me themselves. -0,648

Cluster OXT-08. Erogenous zone of the nipples

№ 0

Erogenous zone of the nipples

Averaging of profiles for 1 scale questions, 819 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,07

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

I have strong erogenous zones near the nipples and on the back of the neck. 1,000

Cluster OXT-09. Love of children

№ 0

Love of children

Averaging of profiles for 7 scale questions, 17434 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,19

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I love children very much. 0,986
2. I have, or would very much like to have, at least three or more children. 0,921
3. How many children do you plan to have over the course of your life? 1) None 2) One 3) Two 4) Three 5) Four or more 0,866
4. If you were engaged in charitable work in poor African countries, what would you prefer to invest money in? - 1) Programs for limiting and controlling birth rates. 5) Reducing child mortality. 0,842
5. I am very fond of children; at times I give in to them, often even contrary to the requirements of their proper upbringing. 0,841
6. Compared with most people, I am a more attentive and caring parent (and if I do not yet have children, I am convinced that I will be exactly that kind of parent) 0,810
7. Children, including other people’s children, adore me and are very happy when I appear. 0,756

Cluster OXT-10. Need to feel unity with people

№ 0

Need to feel unity with people

Averaging of profiles for 30 scale questions, 34020 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,23

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I like feeling my unity with other people in experiences, indignation, or other vivid emotions - for example, sitting beside like-minded people in the stands of a stadium. 0,874
2. I usually like participating in group singing in company. 0,869
3. I often take an interest in other people’s lives. 0,865
4. I would gladly spend most of my time communicating with pleasant people. 0,850
5. I often ask people close to me about their mood (in any case, on average more often than they ask me). 0,833
6. I ask aloud about the affairs of people close to me more often than they ask about mine. 0,811
7. It is always more convenient to do any task in interaction with suitable people than alone. 0,790
8. I often take an interest in the affairs of my relatives. 0,787
9. I often think about my family and people close to me. 0,783
10. I readily reduce the interpersonal distance with the overwhelming majority of new acquaintances. 0,770
11. When meeting my friends, I always ask them about something. 0,770
12. I like bringing people together. 0,761
13. I like being part of a group. 0,749
14. All people are closely connected with one another and influence one another, and this is good. 0,664
15. I depend on public opinion (in any case - no less, and rather more, than others). 0,632
16. I am a team person, and in work I always rely on the team’s cohesion and division of labor within it. 0,630
17. My level of satisfaction and calm increases noticeably if a loved one is nearby, close at hand. 0,627
18. I was raised in a close-knit family; everyone in it stood firmly up for one another. 0,584
19. In sports, I always sincerely and passionately root for our side. 0,554 --------------------—
20. I like doing everything alone. Even a small group puts me under a lot of strain. -0,883
21. Other people interest me little. -0,876
22. It is true that I do not feel any particular closeness to people close to me – I do not understand them, and they do not understand me. -0,873
23. I sometimes catch myself feeling absolutely nothing toward people close to me – neither good nor bad. -0,867
24. Other people interest me little. -0,838
25. Any relationships with people are only disorderly and only restrict freedom. -0,830
26. I more often strive for separation than for unification. -0,809
27. I am indifferent both to praise and to criticism from others. -0,765
28. I disapprove of people who are forever clustering into groups, packs, and heaps, thereby demonstrating their animal herd instinct. -0,722
29. I believe that the collective and «common opinion» are very rarely right (in practice – almost never). -0,647
30. I need other people only when I am calm, whereas when I am agitated, I am better off alone. -0,564

Cluster OXT-11. Often consults others

№ 0

Often consults others

Averaging of profiles for 10 scale questions, 18299 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,15

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I often feel a desire to ask others for advice about what to do next. 0,852
2. When making decisions, I tend to have doubts and consult authorities. 0,823
3. I often ask acquaintances which of the available possibilities I should make use of. 0,793
4. I tend to make a point of consulting other people on questions in which I consider myself weak. 0,775
5. When starting something new to me, I always consult someone about how to avoid possible problems. 0,642
6. It often happens that I postpone deciding an issue until I have gathered different opinions and consulted other knowledgeable people. 0,619 --------------—
7. I always make decisions independently, and if I consult others - it is only for form’s sake. -0,825
8. I very rarely ask anyone for help or assistance - deep down I believe that asking for help is humiliating. -0,746
9. It is true that I never show that I need someone’s advice (even when I am consulting them). -0,720
10. I rarely follow “book” advice or persuasion from others - I listen and then do things my own way. -0,629

Cluster OXT-12. Gaze into the eyes or eye area of another person

№ 0

Gaze into the eyes or eye area of another person

Averaging of profiles for 7 scale questions, 20557 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,16

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. When talking, I have a habit of looking a person directly in the eyes. 0,878
2. I practically always look at some specific person or thing rather than directing my gaze into infinite space. 0,672
3. When meeting a new person, I pay a great deal of attention to their eyes - they always tell me a great deal about that person. 0,554 ----------—
4. I usually look slightly to the side rather than into a person’s eyes. -0,893
5. When someone addresses me, I usually look not into the person’s eyes but at their mouth or somewhere off to the side. -0,805
6. I cannot stand it when someone stares directly into my eyes; I avert my gaze to the side. -0,805
7. A direct “eye-to-eye” gaze is unpleasant to me; I usually prefer to look slightly “to the side.” -0,788

Cluster OXT-13. Enhanced social memory. Observant memory for people’s faces and voices

№ 0

Enhanced social memory. Observant memory for people’s faces and voices

Averaging of profiles for 11 scale questions, 17066 respondent responses in total.

All profiles (type, functional, trait), except those specifically stipulated and the first type profile (normalized to a zero intertype mean and a unit intertype sigma), are presented as averaged EMPIRICAL LINEAR CORRELATIONS of the corresponding socionic indicators with the property under consideration.

Correlations of the property with the degree of expression of the corresponding type in respondents’ personal profiles

Approximate percentage of representatives of each type group giving the raw responses “YES” and “RATHER YES” to each individual averaged scale question (taking the sign of the question into account). For a scale consisting of many questions, the contrast will be greater because the probabilities of many questions are multiplied:

What fraction of the total variance of the property under consideration (in the form of responses to the question) in the population is explained purely socionically, that is, without the influence of randomness of responses and situational-environmental factors. NO LESS THAN:

0,22

Contribution of the traits to the socionically explained part of the variance of the property, in percent:

1. I remember people’s facial expressions well. 0,957
2. I distinguish people well by their faces. 0,947
3. I have a good memory for the timbre and coloration of the voices of various people I happen to meet. 0,862
4. I can easily mentally visualize the faces of people I know - with all their details and particulars 0,836
5. I easily remember new, previously unfamiliar faces. 0,773 --------------—
6. I remember people’s faces poorly - when first meeting someone, I generally find it difficult to remember anyone’s face. -0,936
7. It is difficult, almost impossible, for me to vividly reproduce in my imagination, with my “inner hearing,” the living voices of my relatives, acquaintances, and friends - with their characteristic timbre, coloration, and intonations. -0,897
8. To me, all cats look the same, all kiosks look the same, all homeless people look the same. -0,885
9. My memory for faces is “nonexistent” - I fail to recognize people by face whom I have seen several times, and once I turn away, there is no way I can either mentally visualize or verbally describe a person with whom I have just been speaking. -0,872
10. I have difficulty interpreting people’s facial expressions, and therefore avoid close contact and mutual gazes. -0,840
11. I remember people’s voices poorly and recognize them poorly over the telephone. -0,830