Se - function of individual competitive advantage (analysis of Talanov's questionnaires statistics)

![][image3]

Definition:

Se, “power sensorics” is a function of the living, responsible for the extraction of the best material resources necessary for survival and reproduction (sensory), in conditions of their limitation and competition for them from many subjects (decisive environment). Like Ne, Se is engaged in the implementation of the interests inherent in the subject (statics) in the external world (extroversion), and like Ne, avoids any social control, striving for what is desired at the moment (irrationality). In all other respects, Se and Ne are antagonistic to each other. Ne is looking for new ecological niches, while Se is fighting for dominance in old ones. Ne erases boundaries, and Se strengthens them from the inside and pushes them out. Ne broadens the search to find more different things, and Se narrows it to focus on the most obvious.
On the genetic substrate, Ne creates a behavior-modifying superstructure in the form of a language transmitted through learning, while Se reduces all meanings to basic instincts, ultimately genetically determined. As a result, Ne creates excess diversity wherever it predominates, and Se generates competition in which a narrow range of biological forms best adapted to current conditions survive.

The actual sensory nature of Se is manifested primarily in its close connection with muscle tone and reaction, which allows one to quickly and accurately interact with objects in the external world. That is, to put it simply, Se works when we try to quickly grab something, hit it with precision, or move it sharply. The accuracy of coordination of movements is what brings Se and Si together. The difference between them, firstly, is that Se is more responsible for fast and sharp (rather than slow and gentle) movements, and secondly, Se is more concentrated on interaction with external objects (rather than on coordinating the movements of the body itself for safe movement in the surrounding space - the latter is closer to the function Si).

As an extroverted function, Se is more than others responsible for self-confidence, including and especially in situations of interpersonal interaction. Increases Se and general energy potential of the individual. However, Si, Ne and Ni reduce this potential, so here it is more accurate to say that this energy of Se is fully manifested against a rational background, that is, for those who have Se in the position of the 8 function - and therefore, this property is not may represent the central sense of Se.

The irrationality of Se is most manifested in the tendency to take unjustified risks against the background of general self-confidence. However, if we consider Se in the totality of its properties, then among the irrational functions it least tends toward irrationality - which is especially evident in the contrast with the hyper-irrational Ne. Why is that? Apparently, this is due to the fact that Se, focusing on the already existing world, strives to possess its benefits; to complete possession, it is necessary to retain these benefits, and this requires rational planning. Therefore, the actual irrational essence of Se manifests itself in a rather narrow range of situations - when it comes to raids and robbery. However, as soon as Se needs to keep the loot, it cooperates with any of the rational functions - either with Ti (covering the thirst for profit with state laws) or, less often, with Fi (forming the image of the robber as a respected person in his environment).

In combination with Te, Se reduces any fears, doubts, suppresses feelings of guilt - everything so that the subject is not constrained in his actions and thus has an advantage in natural selection - that is, where the conditions of selection are set by objective criteria of the external environment. The combination of Se with Fe fully manifests itself in a situation of sexual selection - radically increasing both the sexual desire of the subject himself and his sexual attractiveness to potential partners.

However, the most fundamental differences in the nature of Se activity are introduced not by rational, but by questim-declatim functions. It turns out that the most odious manifestations of the power dominance of Se are characteristic only when it is combined with aristocratic functions, which is the case in the 2nd quadra.
The combination Se + Qe is responsible for offensive aggression and thirst for power, while Se + Di manifests itself in situations of forceful dominance and military subordination, clearing the social space of “weaklings”.
Against the democratic background of the 3rd quadra, Se is realized more in terms of individual persistence and demands for protecting one’s rights.
The combination of Se + Qi gives rise to stubbornness in pushing through one’s opinion - this is exactly the case when a loner rushes against the system, confident in his right to break it.
Se+De realizes itself more in situations of competitive struggle between equal subjects, having the advantage of being especially omnivorous in the choice of means on the way to the goal and the weakness of the self-preservation instinct.

And as a final question. Why are the descriptions of Se so different in MBTI and in socionics? Why, when talking about Se, many people primarily have forceful dominance, while others look at them blankly and answer that Se is more about hedonism?

Everything is very simple. Se, like any other function, combines the properties of the main and value attribute. In this case - sensorics and decisiveness, respectively. However, the contribution of these two traits in a particular person (and in a particular personality trait) can vary greatly. If the contribution of sensorics dominates, then after Se, Si also intensifies, and as a result we have a person whose main life goal is to get everything he wants from this world, more and faster; receiving for the sake of subsequent consumption - that is, a kind of extroverted hedonism, however, not alien to conflict - if there are other hunters for what is desired.
However, if the contribution of decisiveness dominates, then after Se, Ni also increases, and as a result we get a psychopathic personality, the main property of which is to derive pleasure directly from the conflicts that he himself incites through his actions. This pleasure has a dual nature, which combines the sadistic inclinations inherent in Se and the masochistic inclinations of Ni. It is precisely such subjects, in which Se+Ni are combined with a certain predominance of Se, that always and everywhere form the basis of the criminal world, and it is from among them that future tyrants and executioners of their peoples make their way up in the totalitarian hierarchies (in the latter case, a contribution is also required Qe+Di).

========================================================

Main personality traits associated with the Se function (in order of the correlation with the profile of “pure Se”)
Here and further the number after the property indicates the correlation of the property with the socionic profile of this cluster as a whole.

1 Desire for possession

2 Accuracy of fast physical reaction

3 Offensive aggression

4 Able to firmly defend his interests

5 Exacerbates contradictions by pushing one’s opinion

6 Receives [sadomasochistic] pleasure from conflicts

7 Only understands the language of power

8 Not afraid of pain (and everything that could potentially cause it)

9 Does not doubt the decisions made

10 Self-confidence

11 Uninhibited in communication

12 Affirmative, persuasive manner of speech

13 Selfishness, thieves’ values, lack of shame and guilt

14 Worries and fears are not typical

there are no questions with “yes” answers, questions with “no” answers are below

15 Enough energy for action

there are no questions with “yes” answers, questions with “no” answers are below

16 Tends to take risks, neglecting “safety nets”

17 Able to live among enemies (type of crime boss)

18 Bad, unkind attitude towards people

What are the numbers for?
Where functions are given, the numbers are arbitrary and indicate the relative contribution of the function to the property. For example, in the first row we see that “thirst for possession” is most strongly increased by Se (11, the largest number in a row), but also increased by Fe (4) and, maybe, De (2), while functions with negative numbers - Ne (-7), Ti (-4) and Qe (-3), on the contrary, weaken this quality.

The numbers in the type columns literally mean the deviation in % of the proportion of holders of this property above average among people of this type from the proportion of holders of this property in the population as a whole. For example, row 10: the highest (29) self-confidence is found in SEE and LIE, the lowest in EII (-28). Adding the average, we find that increased self-confidence is characteristic of 49 + 29 = 78% of representatives of SEE and LIE, but only 49 - 28 = 21% of EII.

The numbers in the feature columns show which feature has the strongest effect on a given property. For example, for the property “accuracy of quick reactions” (line 2) it is clear that the largest number by modulus (-0.83) is in the column of intuition, where the minus means the predominance of the sensory pole - as the opposite of what is indicated in the heading (positive values, by tradition, usually have those poles of features that the ILE type has - in principle, this does not affect anything, it was just agreed upon one day). That is, here we see that sensory is mainly responsible for “accuracy of quick reactions”. But strong “thirst for possession” is composed equally of the influence of several features - sensory (-0.56), extroversion (0.55), decisiveness (-0.44), ethics (-0.25).

More on Se

← Back to Se