Shared Psychological Properties and Values in the Dual Pair of Psychotypes ESI and LIE

V. L. Talanov

This work is a continuation of studies [2-3], which examined the shared psychological properties and values of five dual pairs of the first, second, and third quadras. Here, content clusters of psychological values and properties shared by the ESI and LIE TIMs are examined. In the captions to the diagrams showing the distribution of trait magnitude across the 16 TIMs, the largest shared projections mean the largest projections (in descending order) of the trait onto the poles of those traits whose polarity is shared by the dual types (in our case, ESI and LIE). In many cases, the properties under consideration also have substantial projections onto basic traits that are non-invariant for duals (extraversion-introversion, logic-ethics, intuition-sensing), but we do not specify such “asymmetric” projections in the figure captions. The numerical values on the ordinate axis of the diagrams correspond to the group-average expression of the trait for each TIM (in fractions of the population standard deviation).

Fig. 1. A cluster of 11 correlated questionnaire items. Democratic orientation, republican convictions, belief in the principle of equality, a heightened sense of justice, responsibility for others, defense of the rights of the weak. Largest shared projections - onto the Democratic, Rational, and Result poles.

Fig. 2. A cluster of 9 items. Benevolence, readiness and disposition to help another person, above-average development of readiness to take the interests of others into account, capacity for sympathy, and altruistic motives. Largest shared projections - onto the Rational, Democratic, and Result poles.

Fig. 3. A cluster of 5 items. Commitment to the values of an open society built on truth and openness of information, without lies and secrecy; a tendency likewise to express one’s own desires directly, honestly, and openly, without intrigue. Largest shared projections - onto the Democratic, Rational, and Result poles.

Fig. 4. A cluster of 3 items. Recognition of the priority of individual human rights over state interests. Largest shared projections - onto the Democratic, Serious, and Result poles.

Fig. 5. Placability, willingness to forgive. Largest shared projections - onto the Serious and Result poles.

Fig. 6. A cluster of three items. A sense of self-sufficiency, self-reliance, and independence. Largest shared projections - onto the Rational, Serious, and Result poles.

Fig. 7. A cluster of six items. Demandingness toward oneself and others: including demandingness regarding the quality of work, order, and observance of one’s rights. Largest shared projections - onto the Rational and Decisive poles.

Fig. 8. A cluster of 13 items. Personal reliability, dependability. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational and Serious poles.

Fig. 9. A cluster of 7 items. Striving for specificity and unambiguity, intolerance of multivariance and uncertainty. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational and Carefree poles.

Fig. 10. A cluster of 17 items. Diligence and energy in work, a tendency toward constant strenuous activity, high organization and efficiency in work and in the use of time. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 11. A cluster of 3 items. Conservative stability in sympathies and antipathies. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 12. A cluster of 2 items. Firm and unequivocal moral principles. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational, Carefree, and Decisive poles.

Fig. 13. A cluster of 6 items. A tendency toward long-term planning and setting major long-term goals; planning one’s work, life, and career. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational, Decisive, and Carefree poles.

Fig. 14. A cluster of 4 items. A well-developed interest in tomorrow, emotional coloration of tomorrow, thoughts about tomorrow, planning for tomorrow. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 15. A cluster of 10 items. Heightened interest in career advancement and administrative leadership. Largest shared projections – onto the Decisive and Rational poles.

Fig. 16. A cluster of 13 items. Persistence and assertive drive in achieving a goal. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational and Decisive poles.

Fig. 17. A cluster of 11 items. Peaceableness, nonaggressiveness, achievement of goals by methods not based on violence, fear, and intimidation. Largest shared projections – onto the Democratic, Result, Rational, and Serious poles.

Fig. 18. A cluster of 3 items. Foresight in life, a tendency toward precaution, calculation of consequences. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 19. A cluster of 5 items. Communicative flexibility, diplomacy. Largest shared projections – onto the Result, Yielding, Democratic, Carefree, and Serious poles.

Fig. 20. A cluster of 6 items. Fear of pain, heightened pain sensitivity. Largest shared projections – onto the Carefree, Result, and Democratic poles.

Fig. 21. A cluster of 2 items. Hypochondria. Largest shared projections – onto the Carefree and Democratic poles.

Fig. 22. A cluster of 3 items. Ability to establish useful connections and make use of them. Largest shared projections – onto the Decisive and Result poles.

Fig. 23. Greed in the sense of “what I have is never enough”, “covetous eyes”.. Largest shared projections – onto the Decisive pole.

Fig. 24. A cluster of 11 items. Business qualities - business acumen, enterprise, practicality, a calculating disposition, thrift. Largest shared projections – onto the Decisive pole.

Fig. 25. A cluster of 3 items. High differential auditory thresholds (poor discriminative ability of hearing). Largest shared projections – onto the Democratic and Serious poles.

Fig. 26. A cluster of 7 items. Absence of episodes of positive symptomatology of the schizothymic spectrum (illusions, perceptual deceptions, hypnagogic hallucinations, jumps in thought, etc.). Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 27. A cluster of 2 items. No history of paroxysmal episodes with a sensation of air hunger. Largest shared projections – onto the Yielding pole.

Fig. 28. A cluster of 3 items. No history of paroxysmal episodes with loss of memory for recent events (amnesia). Largest shared projections – onto the Rational pole.

Fig. 29. A cluster of 3 items. Quick mind, rapid comprehension - the ability to collect one’s thoughts quickly, anticipate the situation and other people’s thoughts, and easily distinguish the main from the secondary. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational and Decisive poles.

Fig. 30. Poor, below-average abilities in acquiring foreign languages. Largest shared projections – onto the Rational, Democratic, and Yielding poles.

Fig. 31. A tendency to tire quickly of “overly clever and serious” conversations. Largest shared projections – onto the Serious and Result poles.

References

1. Talanov V. L. Ideological Differences and Psychological Types of People. http://www.newsocionicsmodel.narod.ru/Ideology.html
2. Talanov V. L. Shared Psychological Properties and Values in Dual Pairs of Psychotypes. Psychotypes of the Alpha and Beta Quadras. http://www.newsocionicsmodel.narod.ru/dualy1.html
3. Talanov V. L. Shared Psychological Properties and Values in the Dual Pair of Psychotypes SEE and ILI. http://www.newsocionicsmodel.narod.ru/dualy2.html

© Talanov V. L. 2009